Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Thomas Alexander Erskine, 18th Earl of Buchan
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Earl of Buchan#Present peer. as an ATD. Liz Read! Talk! 05:13, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Henry Thomas Alexander Erskine, 18th Earl of Buchan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nobles aren't inherently notable: this one fails WP:BIO due to a lack of significant coverage. Burke's, Debrett's and other genealogical entries only show mentions with no in-depth coverage and are tertiary sources, and therefore cannot count towards WP:GNG, and the Telegraph article has no mention of the 18th Earl. Pilaz (talk) 05:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and Scotland. Pilaz (talk) 05:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Earl of Buchan#Present peer per WP:ATD. Ingratis (talk) 10:15, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect Information and notability not sufficient for independent article Coldupnorth (talk) 09:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect: as Ingratis suggests above. Insufficient coverage to meet WP:ANYBIO but his basic information does belong in the article on the title.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtrrs0 (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.