- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 08:22, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sassco.co.uk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Despite the use of "professional" and "professionally organized" in the article, the website http://www.sassco.co.uk/ clearly states that it is a collection of purely amateur teams. The fact that they have a nicely done website doesn't raise Sassco to the level of notability usually required for articles on athletic teams, which are reserved for fully professional or top level teams in their sport. ArglebargleIV (talk) 20:44, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per nom. RP459 (talk) 01:51, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 03:26, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 03:26, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Whilst I would delete amateur clubs without a blink, I would give entire amateur leagues a better chance if there is evidence of notability per WP:GNG. However, a handful of mentions in minor local papers and websites isn't enough, and I the vast majority of the information is neither properly verifiable nor encyclopaedic. Delete. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 09:43, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. GiantSnowman 13:11, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - a football league with no real claim to fame. GiantSnowman 13:12, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, to me it's only advertising --Angelo (talk) 13:23, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no advertising on Wikipedia please Spiderone 08:10, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.