Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Chládek
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:12, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Richard Chládek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD: still no reliable sources to establish notability per WP:GNG, still promotional, author hasn't improved it since contesting the PROD. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:30, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:31, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:31, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Google searches yielded no reliable sources to determine notability. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 12:39, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources WP:RS as required to establish notability under WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Googling, I could not find anything except unhelpful self-published sources. To establish notability for a fashion designer, I expect to see at least a mention or two by an actual fashion editor, e.g., at any of these. Msnicki (talk) 18:33, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.